A lot (okay, the majority) of my research on reduced
consumption/simplification/minimalism has focused on clothing. Behold my platonic ideal:
I get that this wardrobe won’t transform my quasi-suburban house
into a warehouse studio. But I do imagine a freer, more actualized self, much like
the women in the Title Nine catalog:
Vocation: Nonprofit Communications Avocation: Knitting and Sewing Kryptonite: Naps Fridge: Cold-brewed coffee and string cheese |
The pressure (real or imagined) to have a consistent but not redundant "look" has stopped
me from paring down my wardrobe. As a former colleague used to say, these might be “old
feelings that are not appropriate for the situation I’m in right now.” I entered the workforce in 1992 in a large but conservative city.
Weekend- and work-wear were distinct categories, business casual environments
were rare, and dressing for the job you wanted meant owning a week’s worth of
different skirt suits.
I'm the one on the left. |
It’s 25 years later. I live in a casual city in the laid-back southwest and work part-time for a nonprofit. I’m pretty sure no one thinks about my outfit frequency. With this in mind, I dove into my wardrobe.
The resulting "system" is a 6 Items or Less/Miss Minimalist mash-up. I've designated four "modules" of roughly 6 items each: Fall/Winter work, Fall/Winter home/errands/dates, Spring/Summer work, and Spring/Summer home/errands/dates. The home/errands/dates capsules definitely skew towards home/errands. Unless you go on a date to the grocery store, which is a very real thing when your kids are little.
I'm going to re-visit my Make Nine list this week, and this whole exercise has caused me to rethink (for the 800th time) my approach to making clothing.
Have you ever experimented with a small-ish wardrobe?
I'd be curious to see pictures of your "modules"!
ReplyDeleteI'll try to photograph them this week!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete